Court of Appeal reserves judgment on Edo governorship election, to deliver verdict soon

Edo poll: Appeal court reserves judgement

Alexander Okere , Benin

The Court of Appeal in Benin on Tuesday reserved judgment in an appeal filed by the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party in the Edo State governorship election, Pastor Osagie Ize – Iyamu , challenging the ruling of the election petitions tribunal .

The five- man appeal panel led by Justice M . B. Dongban- Mensem , also reserved judgment indefinitely on the cross – appeal filed by Godwin Obaseki of the All Progressives Congress .

It stated that a date for the judgment would be communicated to the parties in the case .

The tribunal had in its judgement delivered by Justice Ahmed Badamasi dismissed the petition of Ize – Iyamu and the PDP for lack of merit and upheld the September 28 governorship election of Obaseki as Governor .

Not satisfied , the PDP candidate had filed a 41 – ground appeal against the tribunal ’ s judgment while Obaseki filed a cross – appeal on four grounds .

Before hearing on the appeal and cross – appeal commenced , the appellate court struck out a motion filed by Ize- Iyamu , through his counsel, Yusuf Alli , SAN , seeking to correct records of the lower tribunal.

Alli had urged the court to rely on what the second tribunal judge recorded as the true reflection of the testimony of the PDP candidate who was the first prosecution witness , rather than that Badamasi .

The senior advocate, who noted that the tribunal judges had been served but did not respond to the application , described the response to the motion from counsel to the APC, Obaseki and the Independent National Electoral Commission as a “ busy body ” response .

Alli said , “The chairman ( Badamasi ) recorded his own . The second member recorded his version . We are saying that what the second member recorded was what happened . We are talking about the simple recording of the proceedings .

“ The most current condition is for the application to be served on the body of judges. All the three judges who presided at the tribunal were served.

“ But there was no counter affidavit from them challenging this application . Since they were served and did not respond, that is the end of the matter . ”

But counsel for INEC , Onyechi Ikpeazu , SAN , said that the appellants’ application lacked merit as it was based on documentary hearsay and , therefore , should be dismissed. 
Source: The Punch

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s